Establish New Simplified Acquisition Threshold and Procedures Background Congress has long recognized federal agencies' need for a simple, lowcost process for making relatively smalldollarvalue purchases. For more than 40 years, Congress has required that procurement regulations provide for such procedures. Under small purchase procedurescurrently $25,000 or lesscompetitive purchases can be made simply by obtaining quotations from contractors by telephone, mail, or in some cases electronically. The simplified purchase procedures expedite the procurement process; it normally takes less than one month to conduct these transactions because only a reasonable number of price quotations must be obtained to achieve competition. In contrast, larger purchases over $25,000, even simple ones, normally take at least three months to complete. For example, to compete a $40,000 janitorial contract to clean a building for one year requires an extremely cumbersome process that is excessive considering the size of the acquisition. Small Business SetAsides. The Small Business Act requires that all small purchases using simplified acquisition procedures be reserved exclusively for small businesses if there is a reasonable expectation of obtaining from two or more small businesses price quotations that will be competitive in terms of market price, quality, and delivery.1 Under a small business reserve, a small business may provide products of a large business. If the proposed procurement is expected to exceed $10,000 ($5,000 for defense agencies), but is not expected to exceed $25,000, the Small Business Act and the Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) Act require that agencies post either a notice describing the proposed procurement or a copy of the solicitation. The posting must be for a period of not less than 10 days in a public place at the contracting office issuing the solicitation. Small Purchase Floors. In the past, when Congress enacted legislation that increased the complexity of the federal acquisition process, it accommodated the need for economy and efficiency in the procurement process by exempting small purchases made using simplified procedures. This typically was accomplished by establishing a "floor" so that the new legislation did not apply to contracts written at dollar values below the existing statutory threshold for use of small purchase procedures. For example, when the Service Contract Act of 1965 was enacted, it specified $2,500 as the floor; that was also the small purchase threshold at that time. However, while the ceiling or threshold for small purchases was regularly adjusted to account for the declining purchasing power of the dollar, the statutory floors for applying other statutory requirements, like the Service Contract Act, were not adjusted. Similarly, the President often included a floor tied to the current threshold for use of simplified procedures when issuing executive orders affecting the procurement process, but did not provide for these thresholds to be adjusted for inflation. In addition, a number of other laws and executive orders require contract clauses be included in all contracts regardless of dollar amount. As if small purchase proceduresoriginally designed to be a simple method of buyingwere not complex enough with government laws and rules, individual agencies often add further limitations or additional administrative burdens on their use. For example, agencies have placed additional limits on use of imprest funds or require more documentation than contemplated by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). Need for Change Government line managers and procurement officers are frustrated with the procurement process when trying to buy supplies or services under $100,000 because the administrative costs, burdensome rules, and time frames seem so far out of proportion with the cost and nature of the things being acquired. The result is that managers cannot get smalldollar items and services quickly and with a reasonable administrative burden. The federal procurement process requires a minimum of three months for purchases under $100,000. Contrast this with a major company local to Washington, D.C., that averages one to four weeks from the time a request is submitted to the purchasing office to the time a contract is awarded to a vendor for purchases in the range of $100,000.2 The Current Threshold. The current threshold of $25,000 was established in 1986. The OFPP Act provides for periodic review every five years beginning in 1995, with adjustments limited to the rate of inflation.3 The Acquisition Law Advisory Panel to the United States Congress on Streamlining Defense Acquisition Law (Section 800 Panel) has recommended that Congress raise the threshold to $100,000 for DOD.4 Congress has also begun to think in terms of a higher threshold by setting $100,000 as the amount that triggers application of several recent statutes (e.g., procurement integrity and antilobbying). Raising the Threshold. A compelling reason to raise the threshold for use of simplified procedures to $100,000 governmentwide is that it would simplify the paperwork burden for a significant number of procurement transactions without adversely impacting the socioeconomic programs and competitive aspects of most federal spending. For example, during fiscal year 1992, the federal government purchased $200 billion in goods and services. Fiftyseven percent, or 11.5 million, of the total transactions were made using small purchase procedures, yet these transactions represented only 5.6 percent, or $11.3 billion, of the total amount spent. Based on fiscal year 1992 data, if the threshold were raised to $100,000, an additional 45,500 procurements per year could be made using simplified acquisition procedures. The increased threshold would capture a large number of additional transactions, thereby significantly reducing the paperwork burden and its associated costs, but would only increase the total federal spending using this simplified process from $11.3 billion to $13.8 billion, an increase of $2.5 billion.5 The vast majority of federal procurement dollars would still be spent under the umbrella of all socioeconomic laws and regulations. Conforming Other Requirements to the New Threshold. Adjusting the floors of the other statutory requirements consistent with the simplified acquisition threshold would eliminate 1,600 federal jobs. In addition, it would save $50 million in administrative costs by reducing the paperwork burden caused by the current threshold. Further savings could also accrueup to $800 million per yearand be passed to the government and taxpayers from lower contractor costs for goods and services. For example, the threshold for the DavisBacon Act (DBA), which sets wage rates for contracts for construction, alteration, or repair (including painting and decorating) of public buildings or public works, is $2,000. This threshold has remained unchanged since enactment in 1931. As a result, if the government hires a contractor to perform a $2,500 painting job at a federal building, the contracting official is required to: -- find and select a wage determination (a list of minimum wage rates) or request a wage determination from the Department of Labor (DOL) if none of the published wage determinations apply; -- include the wage determination in the solicitation and contract; -- give the contractor a poster explaining the DBA that is posted at the job site along with the wage determination; -- collect and review the contractor's and subcontractor's weekly payroll records and statements of compliance with the minimum wage and fringe benefit requirements; -- return payroll records for correction if discrepancies are found; -- periodically interview contractor employees to ensure they are being paid the proper wages and provided applicable benefits; and -- withhold contract payments and take other steps, if necessary, to enforce the requirements of the DBA. When Congress originally established the DBA threshold in 1931, it apparently intended that the DBA apply to larger purchases.6 However, because the thresholds for applying the DBA and other statutes have not been raised over the years, these requirements continue to be applied to what are now very small purchases. The requirements of the various statutes, identified in Table 1, place significant administrative burdens, especially on small businesses, on a process originally intended to be free from such burdens. Raising the thresholds of other statutes to the same threshold for using simplified procedures and eliminating requirements for contract clauses would make more than 11 million small purchases (that would fall under the new simplified acquisition threshold of $100,000) simpler and less expensive to execute and administer. As the DavisBacon example illustrates, the administrative requirements of these laws are highly complex and cause heavy paperwork burdens to government and businesses alike. The cumulative effects of these outmoded thresholds applied to the millions of small purchase transactions annually is enormous. In passing the original legislation for each program, Congress recognized the need to balance the cost of these social requirements with their benefits to various segments of the public and established thresholds below which the requirements do not apply. In failing to raise these thresholds commensurate with inflation, that balance has been lostwith large resulting costs to the taxpayer. Amending these requirements will result in large savings to the government and businesses while restoring the balance originally intended between costs to the government and benefits to the public. Opening purchases of $2,500 or less to both small and large businesses will simplify the many very small purchases most needed to provide line managers their working tools. Introducing Technology. Finally, application of electronic data interchange (EDI) technology will facilitate the simplified acquisition process by ensuring full access by small businesses to government contracting opportunities and minimizing procurement lead time. Use of EDI can replace transactions traditionally conducted on paper with paperless transactions conducted electronically by automated processes. Under current law, purchases over $25,000 must be advertised in the Commerce Business Daily (CBD). The advertisement process is intended to provide adequate notice to businesses of the government's requirements and normally takes a period of 45 days.7 The threshold for the requirement to advertise in the CBD would automatically increase to the new threshold of $100,000 for simplified acquisition procedures as recommended by NPR. Below the new level, the requirement for CBD advertisement would be eliminated. Even though most purchases below that level would be set aside for small businesses, there is substantial concern in the small business community about this increase. While federal managers would benefit from a reduction of the 45day lead time, small businesses fear that there would be insufficient visibility of and access to federal contracting opportunities due to the loss of the public announcement in the CBD. Table 1 1. Law: WalshHealey Public Contracts Act Threshold: Supply contract over $10,000 Statutes Affected/ Changes Proposed: Repeal law [see PROC05]. (41 U.S.C. 35 et seq.) 2. Law: Work Hours and Safety Standards Act of 1962 Threshold: Construction contract over $2,000 Service contract over $2,500 Statutes Affected/ Changes Proposed: Tie to simplified acquisition (40 U.S.C. 327 et seq.) threshold as defined in OFPP Act (41 U.S.C. 403). [NPR proposal is for new $100,000 threshold under OFPP Act.] 3. Law: Buy American Act (41 U.S.C. 10a et seq.) Threshold: Zero $ threshold Statutes Affected/ Changes Proposed: Same as #2. 4. Law: Cargo Preference Act (46 U.S.C. app 1241(b)) Threshold: Zero $ threshold Statutes Affected/ Changes Proposed: Same as#2.and Preference to U.S. Vessels (10 U.S.C. 2631) 5. Law: DavisBacon Act (40 U.S.C. 276(a)) Threshold: $2,000 Statutes Affected/ Changes Proposed: Same as #2. 6. Law: Service Contract Act of 1965 Threshold: $2,500 Statutes Affected/ Changes Proposed: Same as #2. (41 U.S.C. 351 et seq.) 7. Law: DrugFree Workplace (41 U.S.C. 701) Threshold: $25,000 Statutes Affected/ Changes Proposed: Same as #2. 8. Law: Miller Act (40 U.S.C. 270a et seq.) Threshold: $25,000 Statutes Affected/ Changes Proposed: Same as #2. 9. Law: Gratuities (10 U.S.C. 2207) Threshold: Zero $ threshold Statutes Affected/ Changes Proposed: Continue to apply law but eliminate contract clause for purchases made using simplified acquisition procedures. 10. Law: Covenant Against Contingent Fees Threshold: Zero $ threshold Statutes Affected/ Changes Proposed: Same as #9. (10 U.S.C. 2306(b) and 41 U.S.C. 254(a)) 11. Law: Officials Not To Benefit (41 U.S.C. 22) Threshold: Zero $ threshold Statutes Affected/ Changes Proposed: Same as #9. 12. Law: AntiKickback Act (41 U.S.C. 57 et seq.) Threshold: Zero $ threshold Statutes Affected/ Changes Proposed: Same as #9. 13. Law: Restrictions on Subcontractor Sales to the Government (10 U.S.C. 2402 and 41 U.S.C. 253g) Threshold: Zero $ threshold Statutes Affected/ Changes Proposed: Same as #9. 14. Law: Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act Threshold: Zero $ threshold Statutes Affected/ Changes Proposed: Repeal certification (41 U.S.C. 423(e)) requirements for purchases under simplified acquisition threshold [see PROC11]. Use of EDI in the contracting process should allay these fears. The Canadian government has established an electronic bulletin board to provide online access to information on contracting opportunities similar to the information published in the CBD. The bulletin board provides timely information and easy access for business. By establishing a similar capability to replace the CBD, the federal government can ensure small business access to information on contracting opportunities while at the same time reducing the 45day delay associated with advertising in the CBD and reducing printing and mailing costs. In addition, the private sector is increasingly turning to EDI to conduct business, and some federal agencies have started using EDI to conduct purchasing activities. This trend is highly promising because purchases made through simplified acquisition procedures are the most easily adaptable to an electronic environment.8 Cross References to Other NPR Accompanying Reports Streamlining Management Control, SMC07: Reduce Internal Regulations by More Than 50 Percent. Endnotes 1. Section 15(j) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(j)). 2. Interview with Allied Signal Technical Services Corporation, Space Operations Group, Columbia, MD. 3. Section 4(II) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(II)). 4. Acquisition Law Advisory Panel to the United States Congress, Streamlining Defense Acquisition Laws, Executive Summary (March 1993), p. 28. 5. Data as of July 1993 provided by the General Services Administration, Federal Procurement Data Center. 6. This is supported by the fact that when Congress first provided for small purchase procedures in the Armed Services Procurement Act in 1947 (and the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act in 1949), it defined small purchases as those under $1,000. 7. Section 18 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 416) and Section 8(e) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(e)). 8. Ibid.
You can attach your comments to this document. If you enter your email address in the empty box below and click on the submit button, you will receive via email a form that allows you to link your views to the NPR hypertext.
Subscribe Unsubscribe No Action