Alternative Dispute Resolution


Contributed by: National Performance Review
You can comment on this text using an email form.
1. Increase use of alternative means of dispute resolution. (2)

The President, through directive, should strongly encourage agencies to
use ADR.[Endnote 20] Governor Clinton recognized the need for every
state to use ADR processes to avoid needless litigation; President
Clinton should take the opportunity to apply that dictum to every
federal agency.[Endnote 21]

Presidential support of ADR is necessary to avoid budget incentives that
undercut ADR use, to train agency staff in ADR, to structure performance
appraisals to reward proper use of ADR, and to make it easier to hire
neutrals in a timely fashion. Such support would let agency personnel
know that they should take the dictates of the ADR Act of 1990
seriously, without infringing on agencies' discretion to decide when to
use ADR. Presidential leadership on this issue is a low-cost but highly
effective way to engender long-term and widespread acceptance of the
view that resolving disputes through ADR is not only appropriate, it is,
in many cases, preferable.

Endnotes

20. The executive order should address the use of ADR broadly, rather
than limiting it to the regulatory context.

21. See note 6 above and accompanying text.
----------

Comment on this Document

You can attach your comments to this document. If you enter your email address in the empty box below and click on the submit button, you will receive via email a form that allows you to link your views to the NPR hypertext.



Email Address: Please enter your internet-style email address.



Subscribe: You can subscribe to receive all the comments which are posted to this node and to all its subnodes. Or you can use this form to cancel your current subscription to this node.
 Subscribe Unsubscribe No Action




Do not delete the contents of the box below. If you do, press the reset button.