Doing less with less
My department spends millions of dollars on software for
urgently needed functions. They don't do any systems
analysis, and build them by accretion. They are
extraordinarily difficult to use, and people who have
trained themselves in Lotus and dBASe, and love computers,
can't figure them out. A complex system that works is by
definition an expansion of a simple system that works, but
they don't even do that.
They don't work. When we complain, we are told that the
only problem with the system is our complaints, and to make
it work.
Computers are the wave of the future. We have to get
familiar with them. How many managers don't even know how
to turn them on?
I heard one software developer say that he needed to change
the graphic on a program he was developing, cost-plus. He
said he needed a graphic of Uncle Sam shovelling money into
a furnace. My department paid Martin-Marietta IBM prices
for Hyundai computers.
A GS-15 Management Information Systems person in my
Department has the unique ability of being able to fix a LAN
so it won't work, and of crashing LAN's. He burned out a
$6,000 fileserver doing something he was specifically told
not to do. Several computer people had to work weekends to
fix a major problem he caused by not mapping his LAN menus
corectly. He managed to erase information in a database
which took 8 people 2 years to gather, and have no backups.
He routinely blames temporary employees for his mistakes.
I am held accountable, and expected to perform. Why is this
not also true for management personnel?
[
Back
|
Search
[