PC-Kimmo Reference Manual

a two-level processor for morphological analysis

version 2.1.0

October 1997

by Evan Antworth and Stephen McConnel


Table of Contents


1. Introduction to the PC-Kimmo program

This document describes PC-Kimmo, an implementation of the two-level computational linguistic formalism for personal computers. It is available for MS-DOS, Microsoft Windows, Macintosh, and Unix.(1)

The authors would appreciate feedback directed to the following addresses. For linguistic questions, contact:

    Gary Simons
    SIL International
    7500 W. Camp Wisdom Road
    Dallas, TX 75236                 gary.simons@sil.org
    U.S.A.

For programming questions, contact:

    Stephen McConnel                 (972)708-7361 (office)
    Language Software Development    (972)708-7561 (fax)
    SIL International
    7500 W. Camp Wisdom Road
    Dallas, TX 75236                 steve@acadcomp.sil.org
    U.S.A.                        or Stephen_McConnel@sil.org

An online user manual for PC-Kimmo is available on the world wide web at the URL http://www.sil.org/pckimmo/v2/doc/guide.html.

2. The Two-level Formalism

Two-level phonology is a linguistic tool developed by computational linguists. Its primary use is in systems for natural language processing such as PC-Kimmo. This chapter describes the linguistic and computational basis of two-level phonology.(2)

2.1 Computational and linguistic roots

As the fields of computer science and linguistics have grown up together during the past several decades, they have each benefited from cross-fertilization. Modern linguistics has especially been influenced by the formal language theory that underlies computation. The most famous application of formal language theory to linguistics was Chomsky's (1957) transformational generative grammar. Chomsky's strategy was to consider several types of formal languages to see if they were capable of modeling natural language syntax. He started by considering the simplest type of formal languages, called finite state languages. As a general principle, computational linguists try to use the least powerful computational devices possible. This is because the less powerful devices are better understood, their behavior is predictable, and they are computationally more efficient. Chomsky (1957:18ff) demonstrated that natural language syntax could not be effectively modeled as a finite state language; thus he rejected finite state languages as a theory of syntax and proposed that syntax requires the use of more powerful, non-finite state languages. However, there is no reason to assume that the same should be true for natural language phonology. A finite state model of phonology is especially desirable from the computational point of view, since it makes possible a computational implementation that is simple and efficient.

While various linguists proposed that generative phonological rules could be implemented by finite state devices (see Johnson 1972, Kay 1983), the most successful model of finite state phonology was developed by Kimmo Koskenniemi, a Finnish computer scientist. He called his model two-level morphology (Koskenniemi 1983), though his use of the term morphology should be understood to encompass both what linguists would consider morphology proper (the decomposition of words into morphemes) and phonology (at least in the sense of morphophonemics). Our main interest in this article is the phonological formalism used by the two-level model, hereafter called two-level phonology. Two-level phonology traces its linguistic heritage to "classical" generative phonology as codified in The Sound Pattern of English (Chomsky and Halle 1968). The basic insight of two-level phonology is due to the phonologist C. Douglas Johnson (1972) who showed that the SPE theory of phonology could be implemented using finite state devices by replacing sequential rule application with simultaneous rule application. At its core, then, two-level phonology is a rule formalism, not a complete theory of phonology. The following sections of this article describe the mechanism of two-level rule application by contrasting it with rule application in classical generative phonology. It should be noted that Chomsky and Halle's theory of rule application became the focal point of much controversy during the 1970s with the result that current theories of phonology differ significantly from classical generative phonology. The relevance of two-level phonology to current theory is an important issue, but one that will not be fully addressed here. Rather, the comparison of two-level phonology to classical generative phonology is done mainly for expository purposes, recognizing that while classical generative phonology has been superseded by subsequent theoretical work, it constitutes a historically coherent view of phonology that continues to influence current theory and practice.

One feature that two-level phonology shares with classical generative phonology is linear representation. That is, phonological forms are represented as linear strings of symbols. This is in contrast to the nonlinear representations used in much current work in phonology, namely autosegmental and metrical phonology (see Goldsmith 1990). On the computational side, two-level phonology is consistent with natural language processing systems that are designed to operate on linear orthographic input.

2.2 Two-level rule application

We will begin by reviewing the formal properties of generative rules. Stated succinctly, generative rules are sequentially ordered rewriting rules. What does this mean?

First, rewriting rules are rules that change or transform one symbol into another symbol. For example, a rewriting rule of the form `a --> b' interprets the relationship between the symbols `a' and `b' as a dynamic change whereby the symbol `a' is rewritten or turned into the symbol `b'. This means that after this operation takes place, the symbol `a' no longer "exists," in the sense that it is no longer available to other rules. In linguistic theory generative rules are known as process rules. Process rules attempt to characterize the relationship between levels of representation (such as the phonemic and phonetic levels) by specifying how to transform representations from one level into representations on the other level.

Second, generative phonological rules apply sequentially, that is, one after another, rather than applying simultaneously. This means that each rule creates as its output a new intermediate level of representation. This intermediate level then serves as the input to the next rule. As a consequence, the underlying form becomes inaccessible to later rules.

Third, generative phonological rules are ordered; that is, the description specifies the sequence in which the rules must apply. Applying rules in any other order may result in incorrect output.

As an example of a set of generative rules, consider the following rules:

(1)    Vowel Raising
       e --> i / ___C_0 i

(2)    Palatalization
       t --> c / ___i

Rule 1 (Vowel Raising) states that `e' becomes (is rewritten as) `i' in the environment preceding `Ci' (where `C' stands for the set of consonants and `C_0' stands for zero or more consonants). Rule 2 (Palatalization) states that `t' becomes `c' preceding `i'. A sample derivation of forms to which these rules apply looks like this (where UR stands for Underlying Representation, SR stands for Surface Representation):(3)

    UR:    temi
    (1)    timi
    (2)    cimi
    SR:    cimi

Notice that in addition to the underlying and surface levels, an intermediate level has been created as the result of sequentially applying rules 1 and 2. The application of rule 1 produces the intermediate form `timi', which then serves as the input to rule 2.

Not only are these rules sequential, they are ordered, such that rule 1 must apply before rule 2. Rule 1 has a feeding relationship to rule 2; that is, rule 1 increases the number of forms that can undergo rule 2 by creating more instances of `i'. Consider what would happen if they were applied in the reverse order. Given the input form `temi', rule 2 would do nothing, since its environment is not satisfied. Rule 1 would then apply to produce the incorrect surface form `timi'.

Two-level rules differ from generative rules in the following ways. First, whereas generative rules apply in a sequential order, two-level rules apply simultaneously, which is better described as applying in parallel. Applying rules in parallel to an input form means that for each segment in the form all of the rules must apply successfully, even if only vacuously.

Second, whereas sequentially applied generative rules create intermediate levels of derivation, simultaneously applied two-level rules require only two levels of representation: the underlying or lexical level and the surface level. There are no intermediate levels of derivation. It is in this sense that the model is called two-level.

Third, whereas generative rules relate the underlying and surface levels by rewriting underlying symbols as surface symbols, two-level rules express the relationship between the underlying and surface levels by positing direct, static correspondences between pairs of underlying and surface symbols. For instance, instead of rewriting underlying `a' as surface `b', a two-level rule states that an underlying `a' corresponds to a surface `b'. The two-level rule does not change `a' into `b', so `a' is available to other rules. In other words, after a two-level rule applies, both the underlying and surface symbols still "exist."

Fourth, whereas generative rules have access only to the current intermediate form at each stage of the derivation, two-level rules have access to both underlying and surface environments. Generative rules cannot "look back" at underlying environments or "look ahead" to surface environments. In contrast, the environments of two-level rules are stated as lexical-to-surface correspondences. This means that a two-level rule can easily refer to an underlying `a' that corresponds to a surface `b', or to a surface `b' that corresponds to an underlying `a'. In generative phonology, the interaction between a pair of rules is controlled by requiring that they apply in a certain sequential order. In two-level phonology, rule interactions are controlled not by ordering the rules but by carefully specifying their environments as strings of two-level correspondences.

Fifth, whereas generative, rewriting rules are unidirectional (that is, they operate only in an underlying to surface direction), two-level rules are bidirectional. Two-level rules can operate either in an underlying to surface direction (generation mode) or in a surface to underlying direction (recognition mode). Thus in generation mode two-level rules accept an underlying form as input and return a surface form, while in recognition mode they accept a surface form as input and return an underlying form. The practical application of bidirectional phonological rules is obvious: a computational implementation of bidirectional rules is not limited to generation mode to produce words; it can also be used in recognition direction to parse words.

2.3 How a two-level description works

To understand how a two-level phonological description works, we will use the example given above involving Raising and Palatalization. The two-level model treats the relationship between the underlying form `temi' and the surface form `cimi' as a direct, symbol-to-symbol correspondence:

    UR:    t e m i
    SR:    c i m i

Each pair of lexical and surface symbols is a correspondence pair. We refer to a correspondence pair with the notation `<underlying symbol>:<surface symbol>', for instance `e:i' and `m:m'. There must be an exact one-to-one correspondence between the symbols of the underlying form and the symbols of the surface form. Deletion and insertion of symbols (explained in detail in the next section) is handled by positing correspondences with zero, a null segment. The two-level model uses a notation for expressing two-level rules that is similar to the notation linguists use for phonological rules. Corresponding to the generative rule for Palatalization (rule 2 above), here is the two-level rule for the `t:c' correspondence:

(3)    Palatalization
       t:c <=> ___ @:i

This rule is a statement about the distribution of the pair `t:c' on the left side of the arrow with respect to the context or environment on the right side of the arrow. A two-level rule has three parts: the correspondence, the operator, and the environment. The correspondence part of rule 3 is the pair `t:c', which is the correspondence that the rule sanctions. The operator part of rule 3 is the double-headed arrow. It indicates the nature of the logical relationship between the correspondence and the environment (thus it means something very different from the rewriting arrow `-->' of generative phonology). The `<=>' arrow is equivalent to the biconditional operator of formal logic and means that the correspondence occurs always and only in the stated context; that is, `t:c' is allowed if and only if it is found in the context `___i'. In short, rule 3 is an obligatory rule. The environment part of rule 3 is everything to the right of the arrow. The long underline indicates the gap where the pair `t:c' occurs. Notice that even the environment part of the rule is specified as two-level correspondence pairs.

The environment part of rule 3 requires further explanation. Instead of using a correspondence such as `i:i', it uses the correspondence `@:i'. The `@' symbol is a special "wildcard" symbol that stands for any phonological segment included in the description. In the context of rule 3, the correspondence `@:i' stands for all the feasible pairs in the description whose surface segment is `i', in this case `e:i' and `i:i'. Thus by using the correspondence `@:i', we allow Palatalization to apply in the environment of either a lexical `e' or lexical `i'. In other words, we are claiming that Palatalization is sensitive to a surface (phonetic) environment rather than an underlying (phonemic) environment. Thus rule 3 will apply to both underlying forms `timi' and `temi' to produce a surface form with an initial `c'.

Corresponding to the generative rule for Raising (rule 1 above) is the following two-level rule for the `e:i' correspondence:

(4)    Vowel Raising
       e:i <=> ___ C:C* @:i

(The asterisk in `C:C*' indicates zero or more instances of the correspondence `C:C') Similar to rule 3 above, rule 4 uses the correspondence `@:i' in its environment. Thus rule 4 states that the correspondence `e:i' occurs preceding a surface `i', regardless of whether it is derived from a lexical `e' or `i'. Why is this necessary? Consider the case of an underlying form such as `pememi'. In order to derive the surface form `pimimi', Raising must apply twice: once before a lexical `i' and again before a lexical `e', both of which correspond to a surface `i'. Thus rule 4 will apply to both instances of lexical `e', capturing the regressive spreading of Raising through the word.

By applying rules 3 and 4 in parallel, they work in consort to produce the right output. For example,

    UR:     t    e    m    i
            |    |    |    |
    Rules   3    4    |    |
            |    |    |    |
    SR:     c    i    m    i

Conceptually, a two-level phonological description of a data set such as this can be understood as follows. First, the two-level description declares an alphabet of all the phonological segments used in the data in both underlying and surface forms, in the case of our example, `t', `m', `c', `e', and `i'. Second, the description declares a set feasible pairs, which is the complete set of all underlying-to-surface correspondences of segments that occur in the data. The set of feasible pairs for these data is the union of the set of default correspondences, whose underlying and surface segments are identical (namely `t:t', `m:m', `e:e', and `i:i') and the set of special correspondences, whose underlying and surface segments are different (namely `t:c' and `e:i'). Notice that since the segment `c' only occurs as a surface segment in the feasible pairs, the description will disallow any underlying form that contains a `c'.

A minimal two-level description, then, consists of nothing more than this declaration of the feasible pairs. Since it contains all possible underlying-to-surface correspondences, such a description will produce the correct output form, but because it does not constrain the environments where the special correspondences can occur, it will also allow many incorrect output forms. For example, given the underlying form `temi', it will produce the surface forms `temi', `timi', `cemi', and `cimi', of which only the last is correct.

Third, in order to restrict the output to only correct forms, we include rules in the description that specify where the special correspondences are allowed to occur. Thus the rules function as constraints or filters, blocking incorrect forms while allowing correct forms to pass through. For instance, rule 3 (Palatalization) states that a lexical `t' must be realized as a surface `c' when it precedes `@:i'; thus, given the underlying form `temi' it will block the potential surface output forms `timi' (because the surface sequence `ti' is prohibited) and `cemi' (because surface `c' is prohibited before anything except surface `i'). Rule 4 (Raising) states that a lexical `e' must be realized as a surface `i' when it precedes the sequence `C:C' `@:i'; thus, given the underlying form `temi' it will block the potential surface output forms `temi' and `cemi' (because the surface sequence `emi' is prohibited). Therefore of the four potential surface forms, three are filtered out; rules 3 and 4 leave only the correct form `cimi'.

Two-level phonology facilitates a rather different way of thinking about phonological rules. We think of generative rules as processes that change one segment into another. In contrast, two-level rules do not perform operations on segments, rather they state static constraints on correspondences between underlying and surface forms. Generative phonology and two-level phonology also differ in how they characterize relationships between rules. Rules in generative phonology are described in terms of their relative order of application and their effect on the input of other rules (the so-called feeding and bleeding relations). Thus the generative rule 1 for Raising precedes and feeds rule 2 for Palatalization. In contrast, rules in the two-level model are categorized according to whether they apply in lexical versus surface environments. So we say that the two-level rules for Raising and Palatalization are sensitive to a surface rather than underlying environment.

2.4 With zero you can do (almost) anything

Phonological processes that delete or insert segments pose a special challenge to two-level phonology. Since an underlying form and its surface form must correspond segment for segment, how can segments be deleted from an underlying form or inserted into a surface form? The answer lies in the use of the special null symbol `0' (zero). Thus the correspondence `x:0' represents the deletion of `x', while `0:x' represents the insertion of `x'. (It should be understood that these zeros are provided by rule application mechanism and exist only internally; that is, zeros are not included in input forms nor are they printed in output forms.) As an example of deletion, consider these forms from Tagalog (where `+' represents a morpheme boundary):

    UR:    m a n + b i l i
    SR:    m a m 0 0 i l i

Using process terminology, these forms exemplify phonological coalescence, whereby the sequence `nb' becomes `m'. Since in the two-level model a sequence of two underlying segments cannot correspond to a single surface segment, coalescence must be interpreted as simultaneous assimilation and deletion. Thus we need two rules: an assimilation rule for the correspondence `n:m' and a deletion rule for the correspondence `b:0' (note that the morpheme boundary `+' is treated as a special symbol that is always deleted).

(5)    Nasal Assimilation
       n:m <=> ___ +:0 b:@

(6)    Deletion
       b:0 <=> @:m +:0 ___

Notice the interaction between the rules: Nasal Assimilation occurs in a lexical environment, namely a lexical `b' (which can correspond to either a surface `b' or `0'), while Deletion occurs in a surface environment, namely a surface `m' (which could be the realization of either a lexical `n' or `m'). In this way the two rules interact with each other to produce the correct output.

Insertion correspondences, where the lexical segment is `0', enable one to write rules for processes such as stress insertion, gemination, infixation, and reduplication. For example, Tagalog has a verbalizing infix `um' that attaches between the first consonant and vowel of a stem; thus the infixed form of `bili' is `bumili'. To account for this formation with two-level rules, we represent the underlying form of the infix `um' as the prefix `X+', where `X' is a special symbol that has no phonological purpose other than standing for the infix. We then write a rule that inserts the sequence `um' in the presence of `X+', which is deleted. Here is the two-level correspondence:

    UR:    X + b 0 0 i l i
    SR:    0 0 b u m i l i

and here is the two-level rule, which simultaneously deletes `X' and inserts `um':

(7)    Infixation
       X:0 <=> ___ +:0 C:C 0:u 0:m V:V

These examples involving deletion and insertion show that the invention of zero is just as important for phonology as it was for arithmetic. Without zero, two-level phonology would be limited to the most trivial phonological processes; with zero, the two-level model has the expressive power to handle complex phonological or morphological phenomena (though not necessarily with the degree of felicity that a linguist might desire).

3. Running PC-Kimmo

PC-Kimmo is an interactive program. It has a few command line options, but it is controlled primarily by commands typed at the keyboard (or loaded from a file previously prepared).

3.1 PC-Kimmo Command Line Options

The PC-Kimmo program uses an old-fashioned command line interface following the convention of options starting with a dash character (`-'). The available options are listed below in alphabetical order. Those options which require an argument have the argument type following the option letter.

-g filename
loads the grammar from a PC-Kimmo grammar file.
-l filename
loads an analysis lexicon from a PC-Kimmo lexicon file.
-r filename
loads the two-level rules from a PC-Kimmo rules file.
-s filename
loads a synthesis lexicon from a PC-Kimmo lexicon file.
-t filename
opens a file containing one or more PC-Kimmo commands. See section 3.2 Interactive Commands.

The following options exist only in beta-test versions of the program, since they are used only for debugging.

-/
increments the debugging level. The default is zero (no debugging output).
-z filename
opens a file for recording a memory allocation log.
-Z address,count
traps the program at the point where address is allocated or freed for the count'th time.

3.2 Interactive Commands

Each of the commands available in PC-Kimmo is described below. Each command consists of one or more keywords followed by zero or more arguments. Keywords may be abbreviated to the minimum length necessary to prevent ambiguity.

3.2.1 cd

cd directory changes the current directory to the one specified. Spaces in the directory pathname are not permitted.

For MS-DOS or Windows, you can give a full path starting with the disk letter and a colon (for example, a:); a path starting with \ which indicates a directory at the top level of the current disk; a path starting with .. which indicates the directory above the current one; and so on. Directories are separated by the \ character. (The forward slash / works just as well as the backslash \ for MS-DOS or Windows.)

For the Macintosh, you can give a full path starting with the name of a hard disk, a path starting with : which means the current folder, or one starting :: which means the folder containing the current one (and so on).

For Unix, you can give a full path starting with a / (for example, /usr/pckimmo); a path starting with .. which indicates the directory above the current one; and so on. Directories are separated by the / character.

3.2.2 clear

clear erases all existing rules, lexicon, and grammar information, allowing the user to prepare to load information for a new language. Strictly speaking, it is not needed since the load rules command erases any previously existing rules, the load lexicon command erases any previously existing analysis lexicon, the load synthesis-lexicon command erases any previously existing synthesis lexicon, and the load grammar command erases any previously existing grammar.

cle is the minimal abbreviation for clear.

3.2.3 close

close closes the current log file opened by a previous log command.

clo is the minimal abbreviation for close.

3.2.4 compare

The compare commands all test the current language description files by processing data against known (precomputed) results.

co is the minimal abbreviation for compare. file compare is a synonym for compare.

3.2.4.1 compare generate

compare generate <file> reads lexical and surface forms from the specified file. After reading a lexical form, PC-Kimmo generates the corresponding surface form(s) and compares the result to the surface form(s) read from the file. If VERBOSE is ON, then each form from the file is echoed on the screen with a message indicating whether or not the surface forms generated by PC-Kimmo and read from the file are in agreement. If VERBOSE is OFF, then only the disagreements in surface form are displayed fully. Each result which agrees is indicated by a single dot written to the screen.

The default filetype extension for compare generate is `.gen', and the default filename is `data.gen'.

co g is the minimal abbreviation for compare generate. file compare generate is a synonym for compare generate.

3.2.4.2 compare pairs

compare pairs <file> reads pairs of surface and lexical forms from the specified file. After reading a lexical form, PC-Kimmo produces any corresponding surface form(s) and compares the result(s) to the surface form read from the file. For each surface form, PC-Kimmo also produces any corresponding lexical form(s) and compares the result to the lexical form read from the file. If VERBOSE is ON, then each form from the file is echoed on the screen with a message indicating whether or not the forms produced by PC-Kimmo and read from the file are in agreement. If VERBOSE is OFF, then each result which agrees is indicated by a single dot written to the screen, and only disagreements in lexical forms are displayed fully.

The default filetype extension for compare pairs is `.pai', and the default filename is `data.pai'.

co p is the minimal abbreviation for compare pairs. file compare pairs is a synonym for compare pairs.

3.2.4.3 compare recognize

compare recognize <file> reads surface and lexical forms from the specified file. After reading a surface form, PC-Kimmo produces any corresponding lexical form(s) and compares the result(s) to the lexical form(s) read from the file. If VERBOSE is ON, then each form from the file is echoed on the screen with a message indicating whether or not the lexical forms produced by PC-Kimmo and read from the file are in agreement. If VERBOSE is OFF, then each result which agrees is indicated by a single dot written to the screen, and only disagreements in lexical forms are displayed fully.

The default filetype extension for compare recognize is `.rec', and the default filename is `data.rec'.

co r is the minimal abbreviation for compare recognize. file compare recognize is a synonym for compare recognize.

3.2.4.4 compare synthesize

compare synthesize <file> reads morphological and surface forms from the specified file. After reading a morphological form, PC-Kimmo produces any corresponding surface form(s) and compares the result(s) to the surface form(s) read from the file. If VERBOSE is ON, then each form from the file is echoed on the screen with a message indicating whether or not the surface forms produced by PC-Kimmo and read from the file are in agreement. If VERBOSE is OFF, then each result which agrees is indicated by a single dot written to the screen, and only disagreements in surface forms are displayed fully.

The default filetype extension for compare synthesize is `.syn', and the default filename is `data.syn'.

co s is the minimal abbreviation for compare synthesize. file compare synthesize is a synonym for compare synthesize.

3.2.5 directory

directory lists the contents of the current directory. This command is available only for the MS-DOS and Unix implementations. It does not exist for the Microsoft Windows or Macintosh implementations.

3.2.6 edit

edit filename attempts to edit the specified file using the program indicated by the environment variable EDITOR. If this environment variable is not defined, then edit is used to edit the file on MS-DOS, and emacs is used to edit the file on Unix. This command is not available for the Microsoft Windows or Macintosh implementations.

3.2.7 exit

exit stops PC-Kimmo, returning control to the operating system. This is the same as quit.

3.2.8 file

The file commands process data from a file, optionally writing the results to another file. Each of these commands is described below.

3.2.8.1 file compare

The file compare commands all test the current language description files by processing data against known (precomputed) results.

f c is the minimal abbreviation for file compare. file compare is a synonym for compare.

3.2.8.2 file generate

file generate <infile> [<outfile>] reads lexical forms from the specified input file and writes the corresponding computed surface forms either to the screen or to an optionally specified output file.

This command behaves the same as generate except that input comes from a file rather than the keyboard, and output may go to a file rather than the screen. See section 3.2.9 generate.

f g is the minimal abbreviation for file generate.

3.2.8.3 file recognize

file recognize <infile> [<outfile>] reads surface forms from the specified input file and writes the corresponding computed morphological and lexical forms either to the screen or to an optionally specified output file.

This command behaves the same as recognize except that input comes from a file rather than the keyboard, and output may go to a file rather than the screen. See section 3.2.15 recognize.

f r is the minimal abbreviation for file recognize.

3.2.8.4 file synthesize

file synthesize <infile> [<outfile>] reads morphological forms from the specified input file and writes the corresponding computed surface forms either to the screen or to an optionally specified output file.

This command behaves the same as synthesize except that input comes from a file rather than the keyboard, and output may go to a file rather than the screen. See section 3.2.20 synthesize.

f s is the minimal abbreviation for file synthesize.

3.2.9 generate

generate [<lexical-form>] attempts to produce a surface form from a lexical form provided by the user. If a lexical form is typed on the same line as the command, then that lexical form is used to generate a surface form. If the command is typed without a form, then PC-Kimmo prompts the user for lexical forms with a special generator prompt, and processes each form in turn. This cycle of typing and generating is terminated by typing an empty "form" (that is, nothing but the Enter or Return key).

The rules must be loaded before using this command. It does not require either a lexicon or a grammar.

g is the minimal abbreviation for generate.

3.2.10 help

help command displays a description of the specified command. If help is typed by itself, PC-Kimmo displays a list of commands with short descriptions of each command.

h is the minimal abbreviation for help.

3.2.11 list

The list commands all display information about the currently loaded data. Each of these commands are described below.

li is the minimal abbreviation for list.

3.2.11.1 list lexicon

list lexicon displays the names of all the (sub)lexicons currently loaded. The order of presentation is the order in which they are referenced in the ALTERNATIONS declarations.

li l is the minimal abbreviation for list lexicon.

3.2.11.2 list pairs

list pairs displays all the feasible pairs for the current set of active rules. The feasible pairs are displayed as pairs of lines, with the lexical characters shown above the corresponding surface characters.

li p is the minimal abbreviation for list pairs.

3.2.11.3 list rules

list rules displays the names of the current rules, preceded by the number of the rule (used by the set rules command) and an indication of whether the rule is ON or OFF.

li r is the minimal abbreviation for list rules.

3.2.12 load

The load commands all load information stored in specially formatted files. Each of the load commands is described below.

l is the minimal abbreviation for load.

3.2.12.1 load grammar

load grammar [<file>] erases any existing word grammar and reads a new word grammar from the specified file.

The default filetype extension for load grammar is `.grm', and the default filename is `grammar.grm'.

A grammar file can also be loaded by using the `-g' command line option when starting PC-Kimmo.

l g is the minimal abbreviation for load grammar.

3.2.12.2 load lexicon

load lexicon [<file>] erases any existing analysis lexicon information and reads a new analysis lexicon from the specified file. A rules file must be loaded before an analysis lexicon file can be loaded.

The default filetype extension for load lexicon is `.lex', and the default filename is `lexicon.lex'.

An analysis lexicon file can also be loaded by using the `-l' command line option when starting PC-Kimmo. This requires that a `-r' option also be used to load a rules file.

l l is the minimal abbreviation for load lexicon.

3.2.12.3 load rules

load rules [<file>] erases any existing rules and reads a new set of two-level rules from the specified file.

The default filetype extension for load rules is `.rul', and the default filename is `rules.rul'.

A rules file can also be loaded by using the `-r' command line option when starting PC-Kimmo.

l r is the minimal abbreviation for load rules.

3.2.12.4 load synthesis-lexicon

load synthesis-lexicon [<file>] erases any existing synthesis lexicon and reads a new synthesis lexicon from the specified file. A rules file must be loaded before a synthesis lexicon file can be loaded.

The default filetype extension for load synthesis-lexicon is `.lex', and the default filename is `lexicon.lex'.

A synthesis lexicon file can also be loaded by using the `-s' command line option when starting PC-Kimmo. This requires that a `-r' option also be used to load a rules file.

l s is the minimal abbreviation for load synthesis-lexicon.

3.2.13 log

log [<file>] opens a log file. Each item processed by a generate, recognize, synthesize, compare, or file command is recorded in the log file as well as being displayed on the screen.

If a filename is given on the same line as the log command, then that file is used for the log file. Any previously existing file with the same name will be overwritten. If no filename is provided, then the file `pckimmo.log' in the current directory is used for the log file.

Use close to stop recording in a log file. If a log command is given when a log file is already open, then the earlier log file is closed before the new log file is opened.

3.2.14 quit

quit stops PC-Kimmo, returning control to the operating system. This is the same as exit.

3.2.15 recognize

recognize [<surface-form>] attempts to produce lexical and morphological forms from a surface wordform provided by the user. If a wordform is typed on the same line as a command, then that word is parsed. If the command is typed without a form, then PC-Kimmo prompts the user for surface forms with a special recognizer prompt, and processes each form in turn. This cycle of typing and parsing is terminated by typing an empty "word" (that is, nothing but the Enter or Return key).

Both the rules and the lexicon must be loaded before using this command. A grammar may also be loaded and used to eliminate invalid parses from the two-level processor results. If a grammar is used, then parse trees and feature structures may be displayed as well as the lexical and morphological forms.

3.2.16 save

save [file.tak] writes the current settings to the designated file in the form of PC-Kimmo commands. If the file is not specified, the settings are written to pckimmo.tak in the current directory.

3.2.17 set

The set commands control program behavior by setting internal program variables. Each of these commands (and variables) is described below.

3.2.17.1 set ambiguities

set ambiguities number limits the number of analyses printed to the given number. The default value is 10. Note that this does not limit the number of analyses produced, just the number printed.

3.2.17.2 set ample-dictionary

set ample-dictionary value determines whether or not the AMPLE dictionary files are divided according to morpheme type. set ample-dictionary split declares that the AMPLE dictionary is divided into a prefix dictionary file, an infix dictionary file, a suffix dictionary file, and one or more root dictionary files. The existence of the three affix dictionary depends on settings in the AMPLE analysis data file. If they exist, the load ample dictionary command requires that they be given in this relative order: prefix, infix, suffix, root(s).

set ample-dictionary unified declares that any of the AMPLE dictionary files may contain any type of morpheme. This implies that each dictionary entry may contain a field specifying the type of morpheme (the default is root), and that the dictionary code table contains a \unified field. One of the changes listed under \unified must convert a backslash code to T.

The default is for the AMPLE dictionary to be split.(4)

3.2.17.3 set check-cycles

set check-cycles value enables or disables a check to prevent cycles in the parse chart. set check-cycles on turns on this check, and set check-cycles off turns it off. This check slows down the parsing of a sentence, but it makes the parser less vulnerable to hanging on perverse grammars. The default setting is on.

3.2.17.4 set comment

set comment character sets the comment character to the indicated value. If character is missing (or equal to the current comment character), then comment handling is disabled. The default comment character is ; (semicolon).

3.2.17.5 set failures

set failures value enables or disables grammar failure mode. set failures on turns on grammar failure mode, and set failures off turns it off. When grammar failure mode is on, the partial results of forms that fail the grammar module are displayed. A form may fail the grammar either by failing the feature constraints or by failing the constituent structure rules. In the latter case, a partial tree (bush) will be returned. The default setting is off.

Be careful with this option. Setting failures to on can cause the PC-Kimmo to go into an infinite loop for certain recursive grammars and certain input sentences. WE MAY TRY TO DO SOMETHING TO DETECT THIS TYPE OF BEHAVIOR, AT LEAST PARTIALLY.

3.2.17.6 set features

set features value determines how features will be displayed.

set features all enables the display of the features for all nodes of the parse tree.

set features top enables the display of the feature structure for only the top node of the parse tree. This is the default setting.

set features flat causes features to be displayed in a flat, linear string that uses less space on the screen.

set features full causes features to be displayed in an indented form that makes the embedded structure of the feature set clear. This is the default setting.

set features on turns on features display mode, allowing features to be shown. This is the default setting.

set features off turns off features display mode, preventing features from being shown.

3.2.17.7 set gloss

set gloss value enables the display of glosses in the parse tree output if value is on, and disables the display of glosses if value is off. If any glosses exist in the lexicon file, then gloss is automatically turned on when the lexicon is loaded. If no glosses exist in the lexicon, then this flag is ignored.

3.2.17.8 set marker category

set marker category marker establishes the marker for the field containing the category (part of speech) feature. The default is \c.

3.2.17.9 set marker features

set marker features marker establishes the marker for the field containing miscellaneous features. (This field is not needed for many words.) The default is \f.

3.2.17.10 set marker gloss

set marker gloss marker establishes the marker for the field containing the word gloss. The default is \g.

3.2.17.11 set marker record

set marker record marker establishes the field marker that begins a new record in the lexicon file. This may or may not be the same as the word marker. The default is \w.

3.2.17.12 set marker word

set marker word marker establishes the marker for the word field. The default is \w.

3.2.17.13 set timing

set timing value enables timing mode if value is on, and disables timing mode if value is off. If timing mode is on, then the elapsed time required to process a command is displayed when the command finishes. If timing mode is off, then the elapsed time is not shown. The default is off. (This option is useful only to satisfy idle curiosity.)

3.2.17.14 set top-down-filter

set top-down-filter value enables or disables top-down filtering based on the categories. set top-down-filter on turns on this filtering, and set top-down-filter off turns it off. The top-down filter speeds up the parsing of a sentence, but might cause the parser to miss some valid parses. The default setting is on.

This should not be required in the final version of PC-Kimmo.

3.2.17.15 set tree

set tree value specifies how parse trees should be displayed.

set tree full turns on the parse tree display, displaying the result of the parse as a full tree. This is the default setting. A short sentence would look something like this:

           Sentence
               |
          Declarative
          _____|_____
         NP        VP
          |      ___|____
          N      V    COMP
        cows    eat     |
                       NP
                        |
                        N
                      grass

set tree flat turns on the parse tree display, displaying the result of the parse as a flat tree structure in the form of a bracketed string. The same short sentence would look something like this:

 (Sentence (Declarative (NP
     (N  cows)) (VP (V  eat) (COMP
     (NP (N  grass))))))

set tree indented turns on the parse tree display, displaying the result of the parse in an indented format sometimes called a northwest tree. The same short sentence would look like this:

    Sentence
        Declarative
            NP
                N  cows
            VP
                V  eat
                COMP
                    NP
                        N  grass

set tree off disables the display of parse trees altogether.

3.2.17.16 set trim-empty-features

set trim-empty-features value disables the display of empty feature values if value is on, and enables the display of empty feature values if value is off. The default is not to display empty feature values.

3.2.17.17 set unification

set unification value enables or disables feature unification. set unification on turns on unification mode. This is the default setting.

set unification off turns off feature unification in the grammar. Only the context-free phrase structure rules are used to guide the parse; the feature contraints are ignored. This can be dangerous, as it is easy to introduce infinite cycles in recursive phrase structure rules.

3.2.17.18 set verbose

set verbose value enables or disables the screen display of parse trees in the file parse command. set verbose on enables the screen display of parse trees, and set verbose off disables such display. The default setting is off.

3.2.17.19 set warnings

set warnings value enables warning mode if value is on, and disables warning mode if value is off. If warning mode is enabled, then warning messages are displayed on the output. If warning mode is disabled, then no warning messages are displayed. The default setting is on.

3.2.17.20 set write-ample-parses

set write-ample-parses value enables writing \parse and \features fields at the end of each sentence in the disambiguated analysis file if value is on, and disables writing these fields if value is off. The default setting is off.

This variable setting affects only the file disambiguate command.

3.2.18 show

The show commands display internal settings on the screen. Each of these commands is described below.

3.2.18.1 show lexicon

show lexicon prints the contents of the lexicon stored in memory on the standard output. THIS IS NOT VERY USEFUL, AND MAY BE REMOVED.

3.2.18.2 show status

show status displays the names of the current grammar, sentences, and log files, and the values of the switches established by the set command.

show (by itself) and status are synonyms for show status.

3.2.19 status

status displays the names of the current grammar, sentences, and log files, and the values of the switches established by the set command.

3.2.20 synthesize

synthesize [<morphological-form>] attempts to produce surface forms from a morphological form provided by the user. If a morphological form is typed on the same line as the command, then that form is synthesized. If the command is typed without a form, then PC-Kimmo repeatedly prompts the user for morphological forms with a special synthesizer prompt, processing each form. This cycle of typing and synthesizing is terminated by typing an empty "form" (that is, nothing but the Enter or Return key).

Note that the morphemes in the morphological form must be separated by spaces, and must match gloss entries loaded from the lexicon. Also, the morphemes must be given in the proper order.

Both the rules and the synthesis lexicon must be loaded before using this command. It does not use a grammar.

3.2.21 system

system [command] allows the user to execute an operating system command (such as checking the available space on a disk) from within PC-Kimmo. This is available only for MS-DOS and Unix, not for Microsoft Windows or the Macintosh.

If no system-level command is given on the line with the system command, then PC-Kimmo is pushed into the background and a new system command processor (shell) is started. Control is usually returned to PC-Kimmo in this case by typing exit as the operating system command.

sys is the minimal abbreviation for system. ! (exclamation point) is a synonym for system. (! does not require a space to separate it from the command.)

3.2.22 take

take [file.tak] redirects command input to the specified file.

The default filetype extension for take is .tak, and the default filename is pckimmo.tak.

take files can be nested three deep. That is, the user types take file1, file1 contains the command take file2, and file2 has the command take file3. It would be an error for file3 to contain a take command. This should not prove to be a serious limitation.

A take file can also be specified by using the -t command line option when starting PC-Kimmo. When started, PC-Kimmo looks for a take file named `pckimmo.tak' in the current directory to initialize itself with.

4. The PC-Kimmo Rules File

The general structure of the rules file is a list of keyword declarations. Figure 1 shows the conventional structure of the rules file. Note that the notation `{x | y}' means either `x' or `y' (but not both).

Figure 1 Structure of the rules file

COMMENT <character>
ALPHABET <symbol list>
NULL <character>
ANY <character>
BOUNDARY <character>
SUBSET <subset name> <symbol list>
. (more subsets)
.
.
RULE <rule name> <number of states> <number of columns>
 <lexical symbol list>
 <surface symbol list>
<state number>{: | .} <state number list>
  . (more states)
  .
  .
. (more rules)
.
.
END

The following specifications apply to the rules file.

Figure 2 shows a sample rules file.

Figure 2 A sample rules file

ALPHABET
  b c d f g h j k l m n p q r s t v w x y z +    ; + is morpheme boundary
  a e i o u
NULL 0
ANY  @
BOUNDARY #
SUBSET C b c d f g h j k l m n p q r s t v w x y z
SUBSET V a e i o u
; more subsets

RULE "Consonant defaults"  1 23
   b c d f g h j k l m n p q r s t v w x y z + @
   b c d f g h j k l m n p q r s t v w x y z 0 @
1: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

RULE "Vowel defaults"  1 6
   a e i o u @
   a e i o u @
1: 1 1 1 1 1 1

RULE "Voicing s:z <=> V___V" 4 4
   V s s @
   V z @ @
1: 2 0 1 1
2: 2 4 3 1
3: 0 0 1 1
4. 2 0 0 0

; more rules

END

5. The PC-Kimmo Lexicon Files

A lexicon consists of one main lexicon file plus one or more files of lexical entries. The general structure of the main lexicon file is a list of keyword declarations. The set of valid keywords is ALTERNATION, FEATURES, FIELDCODE, INCLUDE, and END. Figure 3 shows the conventional structure of the main lexicon file.

Figure 3 Structure of the main lexicon file

ALTERNATION <alternation name> <sublexicon name list>
. (more ALTERNATIONs)
.
.
FEATURES <feature abbreviation list>

FIELDCODE <lexical item code> U
FIELDCODE <sublexicon code>  L
FIELDCODE <alternation code>  A
FIELDCODE <features code>  F
FIELDCODE <gloss code>  G

INCLUDE <filespec>
. (more INCLUDEd files)
.
.
END

The following specifications apply to the main lexicon file.

Figure 4 shows a sample main lexicon file.

Figure 4 A sample main lexicon file

ALTERNATION Begin PREF
ALTERNATION Pref N AJ V AV
ALTERNATION Stem SUFFIX

FEATURES sg pl reg irreg

FIELDCODE  lf   U   ;lexical item
FIELDCODE  lx   L   ;sublexicon
FIELDCODE  alt  A   ;alternation
FIELDCODE  fea  F   ;features
FIELDCODE  gl   G   ;gloss

INCLUDE affix.lex    ;file of affixes
INCLUDE noun.lex     ;file of nouns
INCLUDE verb.lex     ;file of verbs
INCLUDE adjectiv.lex ;file of adjectives
INCLUDE adverb.lex   ;file of adverbs

END

Figure 5 shows the structure of a lexical entry. Lexical entries are encoded in "field-oriented standard format." Standard format is an information interchange convention developed by SIL International. It tags the kinds of information in ASCII text files by means of markers which begin with backslash. Field-oriented standard format (FOSF) is a refinement of standard format geared toward representing data which has a database-like record and field structure.

Figure 5 Structure of a lexical entry

\<lexical item code> <lexical item>
\<sublexicon code> <sublexicon name>
\<alternation code> {<alternation name> | <BOUNDARY symbol>}
\<features code> <features list>
\<gloss code> <gloss string>

The following points provide an informal description of the syntax of FOSF files.

The following specifications apply to how FOSF is implemented in PC-Kimmo.

A file of lexical entries is loaded by using an INCLUDE declaration in the main lexicon file (see above). An INCLUDEd file of lexical entries cannot contain any declarations (such as a FIELDCODE or an INCLUDE declaration), only lexical entries and comment lines.

The following specifications apply to lexical entries.

Figure 6 shows a sample lexical entry.

Figure 6 A sample lexical entry

\lf  `knives
\lx  N
\alt Infl
\fea pl irreg
\gl  N(`knife)+PL

6. The Grammar File

The following specifications apply generally to the word grammar file:

6.1 Rules

A PC-Kimmo word grammar rule has these parts, in the order listed:

  1. the keyword Rule
  2. an optional rule identifier enclosed in braces ({})
  3. the nonterminal symbol to be expanded
  4. an arrow (->) or equal sign (=)
  5. zero or more terminal or nonterminal symbols, possibly marked for alternation or optionality
  6. an optional colon (:)
  7. zero or more feature constraints
  8. an optional period (.)

The optional rule identifier consists of one or more words enclosed in braces. Its current utility is only as a special form of comment describing the intent of the rule. (Eventually it may be used as a tag for interactively adding and removing rules.) The only limits on the rule identifier are that it not contain the comment character and that it all appears on the same line in the grammar file.

The terminal and nonterminal symbols in the rule have the following characteristics:

The symbols on the right hand side of a phrase structure rule may be marked or grouped in various ways:

A rule can be followed by zero or more feature constraints that refer to symbols used in the rule. A feature constraint has these parts, in the order listed:

  1. a feature path that begins with one of the symbols from the phrase structure rule
  2. an equal sign
  3. either another path or a value

A feature constraint that refers only to symbols on the right hand side of the rule constrains their co-occurrence. In the following rule and constraint, the values of the agr features for the NP and VP nodes of the parse tree must unify:

        Rule S -> NP VP
                <NP agr> = <VP agr>

If a feature constraint refers to a symbol on the right hand side of the rule, and has an atomic value on its right hand side, then the designated feature must not have a different value. In the following rule and constraint, the head case feature for the NP node of the parse tree must either be originally undefined or equal to NOM:

        Rule S -> NP VP
                <NP head case> = NOM

(After unification succeeds, the head case feature for the NP node of the parse tree will be equal to NOM.)

A feature constraint that refers to the symbol on the left hand side of the rule passes information up the parse tree. In the following rule and constraint, the value of the tense feature is passed from the VP node up to the S node:

        Rule S -> NP VP
                <S tense> = <VP tense>

6.2 Feature templates

A PC-Kimmo grammar feature template has these parts, in the order listed:

  1. the keyword Let
  2. the template name
  3. the keyword be
  4. a feature definition
  5. an optional period (.)

If the template name is a terminal category (a terminal symbol in one of the phrase structure rules), the template defines the default features for that category. Otherwise the template name serves as an abbreviation for the associated feature structure.

The characters (){}[]<>=: cannot be used in template names since they are used for special purposes in the grammar file. The characters /_ can be freely used in template names. The character \ should not be used as the first character of a template name because that is how fields are marked in the lexicon file.

The abbreviations defined by templates are usually used in the feature field of entries in the lexicon file. For example, the lexical entry for the irregular plural form feet may have the abbreviation pl in its features field. The grammar file would define this abbreviation with a template like this:

       Let pl be [number: PL]

The path notation may also be used:

       Let pl be <number> = PL

More complicated feature structures may be defined in templates. For example,

     Let 3sg be [tense:  PRES
                 agr:    3SG
                 finite: +
                 vform:  S]

which is equivalent to:

     Let 3sg be <tense>  = PRES
                <agr>    = 3SG
                <finite> = +
                <vform>  = S

In the following example, the abbreviation irreg is defined using another abbreviation:

       Let irreg be <reg> = -
                    pl

The abbreviation pl must be defined previously in the grammar file or an error will result. A subsequent template could also use the abbreviation irreg in its definition. In this way, an inheritance hierarchy features may be constructed.

Feature templates permit disjunctive definitions. For example, the lexical entry for the word deer may specify the feature abbreviation sg-pl. The grammar file would define this as a disjunction of feature structures reflecting the fact that the word can be either singular or plural:

    Let sg/pl be {[number:SG]
                  [number:PL]}

This has the effect of creating two entries for deer, one with singular number and another with plural. Note that there is no limit to the number of disjunct structures listed between the braces. Also, there is no slash (/) between the elements of the disjunction as there is between the elements of a disjunction in the rules. A shorter version of the above template using the path notation looks like this:

    Let sg/pl be <number> = {SG PL}

Abbreviations can also be used in disjunctions, provided that they have previously been defined:

      Let sg be <number> = SG
      Let pl be <number> = PL
      Let sg/pl be {[sg] [pl]}

Note the square brackets around the abbreviations sg and pl; without square brackets they would be interpreted as simple values instead.

Feature templates can assign default atomic feature values, indicated by prefixing an exclamation point (!). A default value can be overridden by an explicit feature assignment. This template says that all members of category N have singular number as a default value:

      Let N be <number> = !SG

The effect of this template is to make all nouns singular unless they are explicitly marked as plural. For example, regular nouns such as book do not need any feature in their lexical entries to signal that they are singular; but an irregular noun such as feet would have a feature abbreviation such as pl in its lexical entry. This would be defined in the grammar as [number: PL], and would override the default value for the feature number specified by the template above. If the N template above used SG instead of !SG, then the word feet would fail to parse, since its number feature would have an internal conflict between SG and PL.

6.3 Parameter settings

A PC-Kimmo grammar parameter setting has these parts, in the order listed:

  1. the keyword Parameter
  2. an optional colon (:)
  3. one or more keywords identifying the parameter
  4. the keyword is
  5. the parameter value
  6. an optional period (.)

PC-Kimmo recognizes the following grammar parameters:

Start symbol
defines the start symbol of the grammar. For example,
        Parameter Start symbol is S
declares that the parse goal of the grammar is the nonterminal category S. The default start symbol is the left hand symbol of the first phrase structure rule in the grammar file.
Restrictor
defines a set of features to use for top-down filtering, expressed as a list of feature paths. For example,
        Parameter Restrictor is <cat> <head form>
declares that the cat and head form features should be used to screen rules before adding them to the parse chart. The default is not to use any features for such filtering. This filtering, named restriction in Shieber (1985), is performed in addition to the normal top-down filtering based on categories alone. RESTRICTION IS NOT YET IMPLEMENTED. SHOULD IT BE INSTEAD OF NORMAL FILTERING RATHER THAN IN ADDITION TO?
Attribute order
specifies the order in which feature attributes are displayed. For example,
        Parameter Attribute order is cat lex sense head
                                     first rest agreement
declares that the cat attribute should be the first one shown in any output from PC-Kimmo, and that the other attributes should be shown in the relative order shown, with the agreement attribute shown last among those listed, but ahead of any attributes that are not listed above. Attributes that are not listed are ordered according to their character code sort order. If the attribute order is not specified, then the category feature cat is shown first, with all other attributes sorted according to their character codes.
Category feature
defines the label for the category attribute. For example,
        Parameter Category feature is Categ
declares that Categ is the name of the category attribute. The default name for this attribute is cat.
Lexical feature
defines the label for the lexical attribute. For example,
        Parameter Lexical feature is Lex
declares that Lex is the name of the lexical attribute. The default name for this attribute is lex.
Gloss feature
defines the label for the gloss attribute. For example,
        Parameter Gloss feature is Gloss
declares that Gloss is the name of the gloss attribute. The default name for this attribute is gloss.

6.4 Lexical rules

A PC-Kimmo grammar lexical rule has these parts, in the order listed:

  1. the keyword Define
  2. the name of the lexical rule
  3. the keyword as
  4. the rule definition
  5. an optional period (.)

The rule definition consists of one or more mappings. Each mapping has three parts: an output feature path, an assignment operator, and the value assigned, either an input feature path or an atomic value. Every output path begins with the feature name out and every input path begins with the feature name in. The assignment operator is either an equal sign (=) or an equal sign followed by a "greater than" sign (=>).

As noted before, lexical rules are not yet implemented properly, and may not prove to be useful for PC-Kimmo word grammars in any case.

7. Convlex: converting version 1 lexicons

The format of the lexicon files changed significantly between version 1 and version 2 of PC-Kimmo. For this reason, an auxiliary program to convert lexicon files was written.

A version 1 PC-Kimmo lexicon file looks like this:

; SAMPLE.LEX  25-OCT-89

; To load this file, first load the rules file SAMPLE.RUL and
; then enter the command LOAD LEXICON SAMPLE.

ALTERNATION  Begin      NOUN
ALTERNATION  Noun       End

LEXICON INITIAL
  0             Begin           "[ "

LEXICON NOUN
  s'ati         Noun            "Noun1"
  s'adi         Noun            "Noun2"
  bab'at        Noun            "Noun3"
  bab'ad        Noun            "Noun4"

LEXICON End
  0             #               " ]"

END

For PC-Kimmo version 2, the same lexicon must be split into two files. The first one would look like this:

; SAMPLE.LEX  25-OCT-89

; To load this file, first load the rules file SAMPLE.RUL and
; then enter the command LOAD LEXICON SAMPLE.

ALTERNATION  Begin      NOUN
ALTERNATION  Noun       End

FIELDCODE lf  U
FIELDCODE lx  L
FIELDCODE alt A
FIELDCODE fea F
FIELDCODE gl  G

INCLUDE sample2.sfm
END

Note that everything except the lexicon sections and entries has been copied verbatim into this new primary lexicon file. The FIELDCODE statements define how to interpret the other lexicon files containing the actual lexicon sections and entries. These files are indicated by INCLUDE statements, and look like this:

\lf 0
\lx INITIAL
\alt Begin
\fea
\gl [ 

\lf s'ati
\lx NOUN
\alt Noun
\fea
\gl Noun1

\lf s'adi
\lx NOUN
\alt Noun
\fea
\gl Noun2

\lf bab'at
\lx NOUN
\alt Noun
\fea
\gl Noun3

\lf bab'ad
\lx NOUN
\alt Noun
\fea
\gl Noun4

\lf 0
\lx End
\alt #
\fea
\gl  ]

`convlex' was written to make the transition from version 1 to version 2 of PC-Kimmo as painless as possible. It reads a version 1 lexicon file, including any INCLUDEd files, and writes a version 2 set of lexicon files. For a trivial case like the example above, the interaction with the user might go something like this:

C:\>convlex
CONVLEX: convert lexicon from PC-KIMMO version 1 to version 2

Comment character: [;] 
Input lexicon file: sample.lex
Output lexicon file: sample2.lex
Primary sfm lexicon file: sample2.sfm

For each INCLUDE statement in the version 1 lexicon file, `convlex' prompts for a replacement filename like this:

New sfm include file to replace noun.lex: noun2.sfm

The user interface is extremely crude, but since this is a program that is run only once or twice by most users, that should not be regarded as a problem.

Bibliography

  1. Antworth, Evan L.. 1990. PC-KIMMO: a two-level processor for morphological analysis. Occasional Publications in Academic Computing No. 16. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
  2. Antworth, Evan L.. 1991. Introduction to two-level phonology. Notes on Linguistics 53:4-18. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
  3. Antworth, Evan L.. 1995. User's Guide to PC-KIMMO version 2. URL ftp://ftp.sil.org/software/dos/pc-kimmo/guide.zip (visited August 29, 1997).
  4. Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
  5. Chomsky, Noam, and Morris Halle. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
  6. Goldsmith, John A. 1990. Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Basil Blackwell.
  7. Johnson, C. Douglas. 1972. Formal aspects of phonological description. The Hague: Mouton.
  8. Kay, Martin. 1983. When meta-rules are not meta-rules. In Karen Sparck Jones and Yorick Wilks, eds., Automatic natural language parsing, 94-116. Chichester: Ellis Horwood Ltd. See pages 100-104.
  9. Koskenniemi, Kimmo. 1983. Two-level morphology: a general computational model for word-form recognition and production. Publication No. 11. Helsinki: University of Helsinki Department of General Linguistics.


Footnotes

(1)

The Microsoft Windows implementation uses the Microsoft C QuickWin function, and the Macintosh implementation uses the Metrowerks C SIOUX function.

(2)

This chapter is excerpted from Antworth 1991.

(3)

This made-up example is used for expository purposes. To make better phonological sense, the forms should have internal morpheme boundaries, for instance `te+mi' (otherwise there would be no basis for positing an underlying `e'). See the section below on the use of zero to see how morpheme boundaries are handled.

(4)

The unified dictionary is a new feature of AMPLE version 3.


This document was generated on 11 May 2000 using texi2html 1.55k.